191
Mr Meade
This is not a very satisfactory Case.
The Medical evidence of infirmity was not very strong at first; Medical leave only since the date of his retirement; and it was given by one of that Medical Certificate has been kept on, his services having ceased when required.
1879 was stated in hind that work of a less trying nature than before had been argued for, but he requests to retire.
It has been neither "increased nor reduced within the last 3 years, and is said to have been $1200, with allowances, from 1 Jan. 1879. This makes a material difference in the pension, which is computed at $408.88 in lieu of $346 per annum.
It seems that the figures should explain the discrepancy in the Statements of the rate of pay.
The calculation of his average salary is not fractionally different from 28 Oct. 1880.
The effect of assenting to this annulment will be to give him 2 years more pension purposes than had been previously sanctioned.
Another noticeable point is, that whereas in the previous Paper of Particulars and its Annexures, in June 1879, the rate of pay was given $960 per annum; and Quarters, and it was distinctly stated that it had been correct, but the variation is so small to require notice. It is, however, not quite clear, under Clause 14 of the Hongkong Pension Rules, that the Salary should have been taken on the average of 3 years instead of at its final amount.
The foregoing attention might be directed to this point, in order that, if the salary was not revised...
Page 191
(Three lines at the top and bottom of the page are kept as is, indicating page metadata)
has been re-written to:191
Mr Meade
This is not a very satisfactory Case.
The Medical evidence of infirmity was not very strong at first; Medical leave only since the date of his retirement; and it was given by one of that Medical Certificate has been kept on, his services having ceased when required.
1879 was stated in hind that work of a less trying nature than before had been argued for, but he requests to retire.
It has been neither "increased nor reduced within the last 3 years, and is said to have been $1200, with allowances, from 1 Jan. 1879. This makes a material difference in the pension, which is computed at $408.88 in lieu of $346 per annum.
It seems that the figures should explain the discrepancy in the Statements of the rate of pay.
The calculation of his average salary is not fractionally different from 28 Oct. 1880.
The effect of assenting to this annulment will be to give him 2 years more pension purposes than had been previously sanctioned.
Another noticeable point is, that whereas in the previous Paper of Particulars and its Annexures, in June 1879, the rate of pay was given $960 per annum; and Quarters, and it was distinctly stated that it had been correct, but the variation is so small to require notice. It is, however, not quite clear, under Clause 14 of the Hongkong Pension Rules, that the Salary should have been taken on the average of 3 years instead of at its final amount.
The foregoing attention might be directed to this point, in order that, if the salary was not revised...
has been re-written to the following HTML format.191
Mr Meade
This is not a very satisfactory Case.
The Medical evidence of infirmity was not very strong at first; Medical leave only since the date of his retirement; and it was given by one of that Medical Certificate has been kept on, his services having ceased when required.
1879 was stated in hind that work of a less trying nature than before had been argued for, but he requests to retire.
It has been neither "increased nor reduced within the last 3 years, and is said to have been $1200, with allowances, from 1 Jan. 1879. This makes a material difference in the pension, which is computed at $408.88 in lieu of $346 per annum.
It seems that the figures should explain the discrepancy in the Statements of the rate of pay.
The calculation of his average salary is not fractionally different from 28 Oct. 1880.
The effect of assenting to this annulment will be to give him 2 years more pension purposes than had been previously sanctioned.
Another noticeable point is, that whereas in the previous Paper of Particulars and its Annexures, in June 1879, the rate of pay was given $960 per annum; and Quarters, and it was distinctly stated that it had been correct, but the variation is so small to require notice. It is, however, not quite clear, under Clause 14 of the Hongkong Pension Rules, that the Salary should have been taken on the average of 3 years instead of at its final amount.
The foregoing attention might be directed to this point, in order that, if the salary was not revised...
191
Mr Meade
This is not a
very
sa hojautory
Cate
The Medical evidence
of infirmity
was not very strong at
Medial offen only
Since the date
Mart 179 Me M Lead
the outret; and it was given by one
of that Medical Cathe
Enter
has hear Keppt on, _ his services harring Sedape
heen required.
1879
Dwas thatod in hind
that work of a less trying
nature than before had been argued
4 lin
من سهند
requests to
No further bildrial
war that, but he
retire
whos luch in th
12740
4
been neither "inversed
reced
$1200,
within the last 3 years,
punsaid to have been of,
with Durantes, from 1 Jan. 1879. materal differti
this makes a
in the plusion, which is confented at $408.88 in heir of $34€ pam..
Jochen
tome that the for: should explain the discrepancy in the Statements of the rato opsalang.
the calculation of ther
Sear Quarter
ancrage salary
is not fractionally
from 208 Oct. 180 Entfüh
The effect of assentuch of
to this anauflment will be to
give him
and years more
pension purppoons
scris for
than had been
previadly Sanctioned.
Another noticeable
point is, that whereet in the
previous Paper of Particulars and
its Annexures. win June
dine 1879
the rate of pay
mad
given
$960
por ann: and Quarters, and it was distinctly stated that it had
Outstan
correct, but the variation is Coy mall to require notices. It is, Dis, havever, not fuito clear, under Clanor 14 of the Kangkang Pension Rules, that the Salary should
have heen tähen
on the average
of 3 years instead of at its
final amount.
The foremos
attention might be dicebot to this point, in order that,
if the salary
was not revised"
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.